Journal of Innovation in Cardiac Rhythm Management
Articles Articles 2014 September

Immediate and Regular Electrocardiogram Monitoring to Assess Conduction and Proarrhythmia of Flecainide

DOI: 10.19102/icrm.2014.050906

ISMAIL HAMAM, MD, STEVEN J. KALBFLEISCH, MD and MAHMOUD HOUMSSE, MD

Division of Cardiology, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH

PDF Download PDF
tweeter Follow Us >>

KEYWORDS.antiarrhythmic drug, flecainide, intracardiac conduction.

The authors report no conflicts of interest for the published content.
Manuscript received June 4, 2014, final version accepted July 16, 2014.

Address correspondence to: Ismail Hamam, MD, CEPS, P.O. Box 212614, Amman Jordan 11121.
E-mail: ismailhamam2000@yahoo.com

Introduction

Flecainide acetate is a class 1c antiarrhythmic drug discovered in 1975.1 The drug is classified as 1c according to the classification of Vaughan–Williams because of its antiarrhythmic activity which consists of a wide electrophysiological spectrum.2

In human beings, flecainide produces a dose-related decrease in intracardiac conduction in all parts of the heart with the greatest effect on the His–Purkinje system. Effects upon atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction time and intra-atrial conduction times, although present, are less pronounced than those on ventricular conduction velocity.2 It slows conduction in the myocardium by restricting fast movement of sodium ions into the myocardial cell membranes to allow maximum expiratory flow.

Flecainide is used to treat patients experiencing paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, including AV nodal re-entrant tachycardia and AV re-entrant tachycardia. Flecainide can also lower sinus node activity in patients with sinus node disease. The drug is also effective in treating atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial flutter. More recently, flecainide was also found to be useful in treating patients with catecholamenergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT) due to a reduction in the frequency of Ca2+ sparks and waves.3 The purpose of this case report and literature review is to increase awareness of the conduction properties and the proarrhythmia of the flecainide.

Case 1

A 66-year-old female patient who had a history of paroxysmal AF, sinus bradycardia, and hypertension. She was started on flecainide 2 years ago. She presented to the electrophysiology clinic in July complaining of dizziness for the past 7 months. She noticed that the dizziness usually resolved with rest. She had extensive work-up for the dizziness and was negative. After the patient was seen in July she was advised to take 50 mg of flecainide twice a day instead of 100 mg twice a day. At follow-up in August and September, the patient did not have any symptoms of dizziness or lightheadedness. Figures 14 show the patient’s electrocardiograms (ECGs). Values of the PR and QRS intervals for the patient are listed in Table 1.

crm-05-09-1758-f1.jpg

Figure 1: Electrocardiogram recorded on June 6, 2011.

crm-05-09-1758-f2.jpg

Figure 2: Electrocardiogram recorded on July 27, 2011.

crm-05-09-1758-f3.jpg

Figure 3: Electrocardiogram recorded on August 5, 2011.

crm-05-09-1758-f4.jpg

Figure 4: Electrocardiogram recorded on September 14, 2011.

Table 1: PR and QRS duration summary of electrocardiograms in Figures 14

crm-05-09-1758-t1.jpg

The normal PR interval duration is 120–200 ms, and the QRS is 60–100 ms. This patient had longer PR values than normal for 3 out of the 4 months, with August being the only month during which the patient had a normal PR interval. The QRS durations became close to normal after July. These results can be explained by the small doses the patient was prescribed to take after July. This particular patient did well under small doses of flecainide. The inconsistency in the ECGs of the patient is most likely due to the antiarrhythmic drug flecainide.

Case 2

A 63-year-old male with known history of AF who had AF ablation in the past and was treated with flecainide 50 mg twice a day. He was admitted for flecainide increase from 50 mg to 150 mg twice a day. After a total of five doses of the new flecainide dose, he underwent echo and exercise stress tests. Echo showed normal heart structure and normal left ventricular function. The stress test was negative for ischemia, but he developed widening of the QRS followed by monomorphic VT on the treadmill that terminated spontaneously after rest. The flecainide was stopped and he was started on sotalol.

Discussion

Side effects of flecainide are minimal and include visual disturbance, nervousness, and dizziness (Figures 57). Chest pain, dyspnea, tremor, headache, fatigue, and nausea are rare side effects of the drug. Patients who are diagnosed with AV block, congestive heart failure, sinus node dysfunction, or bundle branch block are advised to be cautious with the medicine and/or be treated with small doses. The drug does not affect the resting potential of the myocardial cell. Working capacity and blood pressure are unaffected by flecainide.1 Side effects after being injected with flecainide include temporary thickness of the tongue, palate, and lips shortly after administration of the drug.4

Flecainide has been found to be effective in treating a wide variety of cardiac arrhythmias. However, it has significant electrophysiological effects, including a decrease in conduction within the myocardium and right atrium. It is also known to delay AV nodal conduction times.2 The drug causes the PR and the QRS intervals to increase and the conduction velocity to decrease in the atrium.1 The study done by the Department of Cardiology at Saint Bartholomew’s Hospital in London depicted that the QRS duration increased in 44 out of 47 patients being studied. A majority of the patients also showed an increased QT interval.2 For the most part, cardiac activity is dose dependent; the drug has significant effects if administered in high dosages. For example, a large dose of flecainide can cause a depressant effect on ventricular muscle refractoriness.2 Furthermore, the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) results show that flecainide is associated with sudden death or cardiac arrest due to arrhythmia. The study further illustrates that patients who have left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction and are being treated with flecainide are at high risk of death.5

Conclusion

Flecainide is a useful medication to manage a wide variety of cardiac arrhythmias. It should be administered, however, with caution and be followed closely, especially in patients with pre-existing conduction system diseas.

crm-05-09-1758-f5.jpg

Figure 5: Baseline electrocardiogram at the beginning of the exercise stress test after five doses of flecainide 150 mg twice a day in the patient in Case 2.

crm-05-09-1758-f6.jpg

Figure 6: Electrocardiogram just after the exercise was started in the patient in Case 2, note the widening of the QRS complex.

crm-05-09-1758-f7.jpg

Figure 7: Electrocardiogram of the patient in Case 2 showing wide complex tachycardia after a few minutes of the exercise stress test.

References

  1. Mueller RA, Baur HR. Flecainide: A New Antiarrhythmic Drug. Clinical Cardiology Jan 1986; 9:1-5. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hellestrand KJ, Bexton RS, Nathan WA, Spurrell RJ, Camm AJ. Acute electrophysiological effects of flecainide acetate on cardiac conduction and refractoriness in man. Br Heart J. 1982 Aug;48(2):140-8. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Christian van der Werf C, Kannankeril PJ, Sacher F, et al. Flecainide therapy reduces exercise-induced ventricular arrhythmias in patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 57:2244–2254. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Tjandra-Maga TB, Verbesselt R, Van Hecken A, Mullie A, De Schepper PJ. Flecainide: single and multiple oral dose kinetics, absolute bioavailability and effect food and antacid in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1986 Sep;22(3):309-16. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Echt DS, Liebson PR, Mitchell B, et al. Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide or placebo. The Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial. N Engl J Med 1991; 324(12) 781-788. [CrossRef] [PubMed]