Cardiac Rhythm Management
Articles Articles 2011 October

Under Blood Visualization: An Ongoing Fulfillment of the Initial Promise

Samuel J. Asirvatham, MD, FHRS, FACC

Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

PDF Download PDF

Samuel J. Asirvatham

At times, the highest impact innovation for a particular field or procedure comes from an allied field that serves an adjunctive and enabling role. Safe and effective performance of invasive electrophysiology (EP) procedures requires a detailed knowledge of complex physiological principles as well as understanding the associated three-dimensional anatomy relevant for arrhythmia. In the pioneering days of EP, the major advantage that allowed our field to blossom did indeed detail such electrophysiological facts including the accessory pathway potential, entrainment mapping, etc.1–3

When first developed, under blood visualization with intracardiac ultrasound had the potential of being a breakthrough innovation that impacted almost every aspect of interventional EP.4,5 In this issue of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, Brenyo et al. provide an excellent overview of the available technology for intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) and provide us a view of what has been accomplished and what, today, is of commonplace practical value during ablation procedures.6

Promises Fulfilled

Either phased-array or rotational ICE imaging is commonly used today during EP procedures, especially those that require complex catheter navigation and extensive ablation.

Ease of Use

Although much of the information we get today with ICE can be obtained with transesophageal or careful transthoracic imaging, the fact that the electrophysiologists themselves perform the imaging and focus the imaging based on information needed for that particular step in the ablation process being performed has contributed to the widespread use of this technology.

Established Value

For the trainee, the value and safety added with ICE when performing transseptal puncture is obvious and is often the reason why ICE is used during the procedure by having the probe in place whenever hypotension is noted. When there is an expected change in the clinical course for the patient, as detailed by Brenyo et al., ICE imaging readily identifies significant pericardial effusion, valvular damage, and possible ischemia. Our anticoagulation management in the periablation period has been significantly impacted by the information provided by intracardiac ultrasound.7–9 Finding significant thrombi in the left atrium minutes after transseptal and the decreased fear of performing transseptal puncture10 has combined to allow early heparinization prior to transseptal puncture or continued warfarin anticoagulation during ablation, something that would've been unthinkable in the pre-ICE era.

Ongoing Innovation – The Future

The key feature of the truly successful innovations in science is that the breakthrough serves as a platform technology for continued secondary innovation to truly fulfill the original potential of the invention.

Activation Mapping

So called four-dimensional echocardiography was an early promise of ICE imaging. Here, in addition to three-dimensional reconstruction in real time of the cardiac structures, activation points using the mechanical wavefront of contraction as a surrogate for electrical activation were promised. To date, however, this has not materialized as a commonplace procedure.11–14 The reasons why this application has been relatively slow are not readily apparent. Algorithms for quick, real time, three-dimensional reconstruction have been developed, and the incredible frame rates aborted by “close” visualization with ICE should make this possible. When this application materializes in a practical way, the needed innovation likely requires even better temporal resolution and intuitive three-dimensional imaging that reflect the fluoroscopic views that ablationists have become comfortable with. Another reason for this yet unfulfilled potential may be the rise of so-called three-dimensional mapping systems15 that allow us to visualize propagation sequences. However, the limitations with such systems both in terms of defining anatomy and the difficulty associated with taking the activation points accurately need to be appreciated.16,17

Lesion Formation

A remaining limitation of present day EP is our inability to know whether we are creating lesions when delivering energy. With three-dimensional mapping, for example, colored dots are taken to reflect lesions created in the three-dimensionally rendered anatomy. However, the lack of knowledge of catheter contact, transmurality of the lesion created, and, in fact, whether any energy has been delivered to the targeted substrate make these “dots” an attractive video game at best. If, in fact, we knew when transmural lesions are created, the ease with which gaps could be defined and incomplete linear lesions avoided would be considerable.

ICE imaging had early promise for each of these components as in contact, energy delivery at the tissue interface, and transmurality of lesion formation.18,19 Why hasn't ICE fulfilled this important need that in many ways the technology is best fit to do? Spatial resolution, particularly at significant distances from the imaging transducer, and the necessity for multiple imaging planes to define contact and transmurality remain obstacles that require ongoing innovation.

Understanding whether lesions are occurring is not only important in the heart tissue but for collateral damage as well. Brenyo et al. describe the potential value in avoiding atrial esophageal fistula formation.20 However, while ICE can tell us how far the anterior wall of the esophagus is to our ablation catheter, since we don't yet exactly know whether an ablation lesion has caused a full thickness atrial burn, it becomes difficult to know whether the anterior wall of the esophagus or the associated vascular are being damaged.

Cardiac Resynchronization

For the last decade, multiple potentially valuable techniques to identify patients who benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) as well as optimizing devices when implanted have been suggested and have appeared theoretically sound and, in fact, found useful in small studies and anecdotal reports. However, larger, randomized trials have shown no benefit from any single or conceivable combination of echocardiographic variables.21,22 A potential primary reason for this failure of another innovative use of echocardiography to materialize may have to do with temporal resolution and frame rate. Intracardiac echo simply by virtue of the proximity to the ventricular myocardial tissue could allow this better temporal resolution, and, when combined with novel echocardiographic imaging techniques, may be an important adjunct to CRT as it has become to interventional EP. While this has been investigated in smaller studies without clear demonstration of benefit, further innovation allowing quick three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling to use the derived velocity and strain information to predict overall benefit from a particular site or type of stimulation could become an exciting method to decrease the troublesomely high non-responder rates with CRT.

Summary

In this issue of Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management, Brenyo et al. review some major, high impact innovations over the last 15 years in interventional EP. Their review sets the stage for ongoing and future innovation such that the initial, even greater promised device may be fulfilled.

References

  1. Jackman WM, Friday KJ, Yeung-Lai-Wah JA, Fitzgerald DM, Beck B, Bowman AJ, Stelzer P, Harrison L, Lazzara R. New catheter technique for recording left free-wall accessory atrioventricular pathway activation. Identification of pathway fiber orientation. Circulation 1988;78:598–611.
  2. Stevenson WG, Sager PT, Friedman PL. Entrainment techniques for mapping atrial and ventricular tachycardias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995;6:201–216.
  3. Waldo AL. Atrial flutter: Entrainment characteristics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1997;8:337–352.
  4. Packer DL, Stevens CL, Curley MG, Bruce CJ, Miller FA, Khandheria BK, Oh JK, Sinak LJ, Seward JB. Intracardiac phased-array imaging: Methods and initial clinical experience with high resolution, under blood visualization: Initial experience with intracardiac phased-array ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39:509–516.
  5. Asirvatham SJ, Bruce CJ, Friedman PA. Advances in imaging for cardiac electrophysiology. Coron Artery Dis 2003;14:3–13.
  6. Brenyo A, Baibhav B, Aktas M. Contemporary use of intracardiac echocardiography in the electrophysiology laboratory. Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management 2011;in press.
  7. Bruce CJ, Friedman PA, Narayan O, Munger TM, Hammill SC, Packer DL, Asirvatham SJ. Early heparinization decreases the incidence of left atrial thrombi detected by intracardiac echocardiography during radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2008;22:211–219.
  8. Wazni OM, Beheiry S, Fahmy T, Barrett C, Hao S, Patel D, Di Biase L, Martin DO, Kanj M, Arruda M, Cummings J, Schweikert R, Saliba W, Natale A. Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with therapeutic international normalized ratio: Comparison of strategies of anticoagulation management in the periprocedural period. Circulation 2007;116:2531–2534.
  9. Asirvatham SJ. Ablation for atrial fibrillation: Can we decrease thromboembolism without increasing the risk for bleeding? Circulation 2007;116:2517–2519.
  10. Asirvatham SJ, Holmes DR, Jr. How do we get there from here-is it safe and in whose hands? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2005;16:566–567.
  11. Bae RY, Belohlavek M, Tanabe K, Greenleaf JF, Seward JB. Rapid three-dimensional myocardial contrast echocardiography: Volumetric quantitation of nonperfused myocardium after intravenous contrast administration. Echocardiography 1999;16:357–365.
  12. Belohlavek M, Pislaru C, Bae RY, Greenleaf JF, Seward JB. Real-time strain rate echocardiographic imaging: Temporal and spatial analysis of postsystolic compression in acutely ischemic myocardium. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2001;14:360–369.
  13. Packer RD, Wahl M, Asirvatham SJ, Roman-Gonzalez J, Camp J, Johnson S, Robb R, Packer DL. Feasibility of 4-dimensional myocardial doppler tissue velocity imaging for full-thickness myocardial mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:423A.
  14. Asirvatham SJ, Johnson S, Seward JB, Packer DL. Do alterations in tissue doppler derived velocity, acceleration and/or energy predict lesion formation with linear ablation in the canine atrium? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:399.
  15. Gurevitz OT, Glikson M, Asirvatham S, Kester TA, Grice SK, Munger TM, Rea RF, Shen WK, Jahangir A, Packer DL, Hammill SC, Friedman PA. Use of advanced mapping systems to guide ablation in complex cases: Experience with noncontact mapping and electroanatomic mapping systems. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28:316–323.
  16. Del Carpio Munoz F, Buescher T, Asirvatham SJ. Teaching points with 3-dimensional mapping of cardiac arrhythmias: Taking points: Activation mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2011;4:e22–25.
  17. Del Carpio Munoz F, Buescher TL, Asirvatham SJ. Three-dimensional mapping of cardiac arrhythmias: What do the colors really mean? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2010;3:e6–11.
  18. Asirvatham S, Johnson S, Seward JB, Packer DL. Tissue electrode contact determined by intracardiac ultrasound (icus) accurately predicts ablation lesion formation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1999;12:410.
  19. Asirvatham S, Roman-Gonzalez J, Johnson S, Wahl M, Packer DL. Predictors of transmurally circumferential lesion creation with ultrasound energy in pulmonary veins. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2000;23:649.
  20. Grubina R, Cha YM, Bell MR, Sinak LJ, Asirvatham SJ. Pneumopericardium following radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: Insights into the natural history of atrial esophageal fistula formation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:1046–1049.
  21. Mehta S, Asirvatham SJ. Rethinking qrs duration as an indication for crt. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2011.
  22. Asirvatham SJ. Cardiac resynchronization: Is electrical synchrony relevant? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2007;18:1028–1031.

Advertisment